Endometrial Thickness

endometrial thickness I’m pretty sure I am now facing at age 58 a procedure since my endrometrium lining at level 11.

I am scheduled for a biopsy to determine what’s developing now myself.

I started menopause at age 51 and lately showed some slight spotting. With that said, My concern is usually will this be left alone if no signs of cancer are obvious …I am immensely conservative with surgeries and after there absolutely needed. It came back complex hyperplasia without any cancer or pre cancer showing.

The gyn said outright that could be taken.

I’m pretty sure I was in shock that he said this was my option as if we waited, odds always were it will go into cancer. Now let me ask you something. Now after understanding this article I am investigating if that’s possibly something that usually can be treated with a less aggressive procedure? I actually planned to repeat test after six weeks at a clinic that specializes in cervical pathology, where they used ThinPrep technology.

endometrial thickness This second pap test, that was liquid based, came back normal.

It was negative for intraepithelial lesion or malignancy, Malpighian cells without nuclear abnormalities, normal endocervical cylinder cells.

4 months later I came back to first clinic to talk to doctor, who ld me that I must have another pap test at his clinic, merely to doublecheck if there’s nothing incorrect with me., without any doubts, This third pap smear, conventional, came back abnormal. I am a 39 year quite old obese woman diagnosed with atypical endometrial hyperplasia after I had an in office biopsy due to abnormal uterine bleeding. Definitely, we have normal periods, not heavy really about 35 months apart though we did miss one in previous year.

endometrial thickness I actually had 2 heavy months bleeding with clots and had an ultrasound that showed a ten mm endometrium.

I the other day began a diet and exercise program and have lost 15 lbs in about a month.

I had a cervical polyp removed in that time. Thank you a lot for taking time to decision my inquiry. Endometrial hyperplasia has been a regular finding in women entering into menopause, as we see in our article. Why was always he saying we need a hysterectomy preparatory to trying something less invasive first, since mine did not show any cancer or pre cancer. Right away he said that this will possibly turn to cancer. Besides, Is it manageable that this complex hyperplasia most likely clear up on its own or with medication? Virtually, how frequently does this condition revert back to normal. Prognosis depends on the type and stage of tumour. Fiveyear’ overall survival ranges from 74 to 91percent in patients without metastatic disease.

endometrial thickness I am now 41 years old enough with 1 children.

We have spent four years from 2012 2016″ with irregular periods managed with quarterly Provera 10mg x10 months.

My Nurse Practitioner gynecologist in no circumstances seemed concerned and did a Ultrasound in 2012 that was completely normal. All blood work in 2012 and 2016 came back as not menopausal. I’ve typed out my last history six months for our own review. Of course You will see in January 2016, Know what guys, I had irregular spotting that they thought was a period. It lasted virtually three weeks. Testing began, That obviously alarmed my GYN. You will see in March of this year they had a normal ‘in office’ endometrial biopsy. My GYN said it was normal, the wording is confusing on my biopsy report. That’s interesting. A DC was scheduled and a IUD inserted. DC report came back with this exact wording Complex atypical hyperplasia with minute focus bordering rather low grade on endometrioid carcinoma.

endometrial thickness Im concerned that this what’s in the report?

Is this a precancer and seek for to give me any replies back and has left all this up to oncologist. Im merely doing best in order to make anticipation of it all!! Notice, Most patients with endometrial hyperplasia are probably in perimenopausal age group and have probably been diagnosed after their gynecologist has obtained an endometrial for ages being that the patient has complained of abnormal uterine bleeding. Patients and their gynecologists tend to accept endometrial diagnosis hyperplasia as provided to them by pathologist, as if categorizing abnormal endometrial proliferations were a straightforward exercise.

In fact, classification of endometrial hyperplasia has been mostly complicated and subjective, and And so it’s better done by pathologists with plenty of years of experience in this area. By the way, the most simple problem is always overdiagnosing disordered proliferative endometrium as hyperplasia, mimics of endometrial hyperplasia involve glandular dissociation. Telescoping artifacts. Late secretory endometrium. Cystic atrophy, and endometrial metaplasia. Assuming that your own pathologic diagnosis has been fix, I would recommend that you ask our own gynecologist to continue to treat you with a progestin and stick with you., beyond doubt, we recommend that you look for another gynecologist who will, Therefore in case he /she isn’t willing to do this. Odds have probably been rather lower that it is anything substantially, and I reckon a hysterectomy at the moment would’ve been overkill. You get up an interesting pic in intradepartmental peer review.

endometrial thickness Intradepartmental consultations are to be encouraged, and definitely stabilize the likelihood that patient will get improve diagnosis.

a poser with intradepartmental consultations has been that over time pathologists within group tend to happen to be same part tribe.

Actually the tendency to think and diagnose alike, the group members may not see what they donno, and a junior/nonpartner pathologist may feel pressure not to question a diagnosis senior/partner pathologist. I was diagnosed this summer with Grade one complex hyperplasia with atypia, and was immediately referred to a gynecologic oncologist. He referred me to his colleague, a robotic surgery that he didn’t do, doctor we saw adviced surgery. You should make this seriously. When I consulted with the second doctor, he practically considered we treat it with progesterone therapy later; as he’s had success with various patients, even one with a cancer diagnosis, we practically didn’t like surgery idea.

endometrial thickness Returned a couple weeks later where they inserted a Mirena IUD, they was first started on oral megestrol tablets, 40mg twice a day.

Although we a few days ago started having breakthrough bleeding, It’s been about a month and a half, and I’m ok.

Actually I don’t think we was overdiagnosed, an I’m hopeful that the hormone therapy works for me, since I truly don’t like a hysterectomy idea. Tamoxifen was probably commonly used in breast treatment cancer, and exerts its antiestrogenic effect via estrogen receptor blockade. It is whenever binding of tamoxifen to estrogen receptors mimics estrogen effect to some degree, In the endometrium.

This puts patients just like yourself at an increased risk for endometrial development polyps, endometrial hyperplasia, and cancer.

This was probably why our own endometrial lining is monitored via ultrasound.

Know what, I would stick with that advice to ensure that it’s nothing confident, if your endometrium is always thick enough to recommend endometrial sampling. Actually I am 33 and are struggling with infertility. After a latter hysteroscopy and dc and polypectomy they was diagnosed with unsophisticated Hyperplasia. That is interesting. My doctor says she doesn’t have much experience with women in childbearing age or still wanting children. Consequently, She considers I go on Megace for one month and progesterone for five months hereafter do another dc to see if And so it’s still there. I’m almost sure I would practically like to get an opinion from someone a bit more familiar with Hyperplasia. For example, whenever Trtaking food complex atypical hyperplasia with progesterone has been effective about 40 70″percent of time, our own situation isn’t uncommon.

I know it’s not surprising that your most last diagnoses have bounced from side to side betwixt these 1 entities, distinction between complex atypical hyperplasia and lower grade endometrial cancer always was ugh and subjective, that are part of a continuum.

Since I am not an expert on endometrial hormonal treatment cancer, Know what guys, I cannot choice our own question about giving Megace treatment a try.

In last years there was more of a trend to spare the ovaries and tubes in selected cases, the standard treatment for a patient in our situation my be TAH/BSO. That said, This will be a decision betwixt you and your doctor. My area of expertise has been in pathologic diagnosis of gynecologic abnormalities, and the question relates more to decent evaluation and when to perform an endometrial biopsy. I would defer to your opinion gynecologists in your own case.

I would get a biopsy, So if they one and the other recommend endometrial biopsy. Personally I will go that route, if the gynecologist who provided you with a second opinion is comfortable following you without a biopsy. One thing that we was pretty upset about was that when they considered to my clinician that we may get a downgrade after the DC, she said that this was impossible and that there my be no review for the better in my biopsy. That a DC was a measure to ensure that atypia was not worse or carcinoma. This was right as we is wheeled into operating room. She said that complex atypical hyperplasia has no symptoms and is a silent killer, when they mentioned that they had no symptoms of hyperplasia as expressed for awhile as our health care machine/system usually was broke. The docs are mostly machine victims very much of middle and quite low income America in an awful quandary. Nevertheless, in my opinion the endometrium is probably doing what actually is expected in perimenopausal period. I reinterpret plenty of cases of plain simple hyperplasia without atypia as disordered proliferative endometrium, that is discussed in my guest post on this blog.

Neither of these diagnoses has always been much cause for concern.

In my opinion, you have been being followed with endometrial biopsies can be worth it for you to have me provide you with a second opinion to see if I usually can downgrade our own diagnosis to disordered proliferative endometrium, if the doctor responds that our own close ‘proceed with up’ has been depending on your own history of hyperplasia. Contact me through my website at reichertpathology, Therefore in case you need to go this route. Given our ultrasound findings and clinical history, in my opinion Surely it’s reasonable to do an endometrial biopsy. Try not to worry, odds have usually been pretty lofty that it’s nothing self-assured. Now look. It’s a good idea to get a second opinion on your own pathology slides in advance of proceeding with treatment, if results lead you down a path that you don’t look for to go.

You must discuss our own symptoms and ultrasound findings with your own gynecologist to determine whether an endometrial biopsy was usually indicated. Although hyperplasia diagnosis usually can be suspected from clinical and radiologic findings, it could completely be confirmed and subtyped by examining a tissue sample. My question is. Know what guys, I want to avoid any surgery I don’t absolutely have to have. Lifestyle overlook and possibly progesterone treatment in advance of taking this radical step as a hysterectomy, with this diagnosis has been it reasonable to make a conservative approach and try diet/nutrition. Notice, It’s not that I am youthful enough to be concerned about preserving fertility I am opposed to traumatizing the body with any unforeseen surgery. Ihave had a vaginal ultrasound which showed an endometriam of 9mm. Actually I have had no bleeding or any various symptoms. As a result, My Dr has referred me to a gyn but we can’t get in until end of April which leaves me a couple of months to worry. Given that you are asymptomatic and your endometrium is solely minimally thickened, chances that you have a notable endometrial lesion are quite low, and having odds full fledged cancer are not far from zero.

Try not to worry betwixt now and our own time endometrial sampling. I’m quite sure I have no experience with Remifemin, and can not comment on its feasible benefits and consequences, as a pathologist. The ultrasound findings consider that you may have adenomyosis and an incidental fibroid within uterus wall, and a polypoid lesion protruding into endometrial cavity. I do not think that the endometrial biopsy sampled it, so this odds polypoid lesion being anything rubbish always were lower.

I actually recommend that you consult with your gynecologist and decide gether as to whether it’s a good idea to fall under a D If you have been person type who can’t sleep at night investigating what’s going on, so you usually can let the doctor see that you should like to have a D hereafter you usually can advocate for watchful waiting. Keep reading! It is always worth noting that the symptoms have probably been most probably due to adenomyosis for a while because being since polypoid lesion. Seriously. During a hyperplastic evaluation endometrium, the pathologist determines if cytologic atypia has been present within cells lining hyperplastic glands and whether architecture of glands architecture was always plain simple or complex.

It sounds to me like you have chronic cyclic pelvic pain about blood cyclic accumulation within our endometrial cavity.

Scarring of our own endocervical canal from the ablation always was preventing this admixture of degenerated tissue and blood from exiting our uterus, residual endometrium left behind after our own ablation has usually been creating menstrual products.

Since it will provide an opportunity to work off residual endometrial tissue and also have a repeat ablation, By the way I support our own gynecologist that a D C might be beneficial any menstrual products that you create usually can pass since, and open up the endocervical canal. In the case we will proceed with hysterectomy mostly as a last resort, You have usually been junior and hysterectomy has its own set of risks and complications. Please study my comment to Carolyn from Jan. Complex hyperplasia without atypia has been a rather subjective diagnosis. On p of that, I have seen cases diagnosed as such that I will diagnose as disordered proliferative endometrium, for which we will recommend ‘followup’ and maybe progestin therapy, and identical cases that we would diagnose as complex atypical hyperplasia for which we would recommend hysterectomy in a woman of the age.

Given tissue little amount on which this diagnosis was based, I recognize that a DC will possibly provide useful special information.

If your own diagnosis endometrial biopsy is usually improve, To be honest I recognize that it’s pretty next to normal and I should not be if you would like me to provide you with a second opinion on your own slides. Please note that biopsy diagnosis does not shed some light the brownish discharge, that has been indicative of bleeding/shedding with a delay before passage. Situations just like yours are usually rarely urgent, and will usually wait to be diagnosed until you are back in US unless our own symptoms warrant treatment sooner. Every now and then an endometrial stalk polyp twists or its surface is probably traumatized. A well-reputed fact that was always. You may continue to have episodes of abnormal uterine bleeding until our own polyps are usually removed, I’d say in case either of these things has been happening in your own case. Since So there’s not yet any tissue sample upon which to base this diagnosis, realize that your own overseas gynecologist is always using the term glandular hyperplasia rather loosely.

My original comment from Jan 28th still applies.

We would have to review slides and make my own diagnosis, Therefore if you should like me to whether to make provera.

You could contact me through my website, reichertpathology, Therefore in case you need to go this route. Please explore my replies to KM on 11/18/14 and Trish on 11/30/14 on identical topics. Hysterectomy is always primarily better option for women in the age group, So in case you indeed have complex atypical hyperplasia. For instance, they specialize in diagnosis but not disorders female treatment genital tract, as a gynecologic pathologist.

Your own question relates to treatment and is always out of my range of expertise.

That said, I will tell you that a great deal of cases diagnosed as plain simple hyperplasia without atypia would’ve been interpreted by me as disordered proliferative endometrium.

In my opinion, neither of these disorders needs to be treated unless Undoubtedly it’s being done so to relieve symptoms of abnormal uterine bleeding. So if we were you I will discontinue hormonal therapy and continue to see your own gynecologist at for any longer as you are always not currently having any abnormal uterine bleeding. Thence, Disordered proliferative endometrium has been a normal and expected finding in women with irregular uterine bleeding as they transition to menopause.

Misinterpreting this physiologic process as endometrial hyperplasia will result in unacceptable patient anxiety, needless consultations with gynecologic oncologists, hormonal treatment, and even hysterectomy.

Prior to endometrial sampling, the patient may have had an ultrasound that showed a thickened endometrium.

Endometrial hyperplasia is a benign condition in which the endometrium glands have proliferated to an extent where they have been noticeably more crowded than glands searched with success for in the normal proliferative endometrium. Clinical management conclusions have been driven by whether proliferation probably was considered atypical. Ok, and now one of most crucial parts. Hyperplasia without atypia was probably managed conservatively as a ‘self limited’ process, whereas atypical hyperplasia is always considered precancerous and is usually treated with hysterectomy. Thank you for this blog supporting lots of women!

Actually I am a 48 year old enough, 5’5″, 125 lbs.

We have had irregular bleeding since I was diagnosed with complex endometrial hyperplasia with atypia on March 2013 by an endometrial biopsy.

To be honest I was placed on Mirena IUD and oral Provera 10mg/day. 2 months later, I did endometrial biopsy and showed complex endometrial hyperplasia without atypia. Actually I continued to repeat endometrial biopsy any three months until Dec. On June 2014 endometrial biopsy showed lower grade endometrial cancer, Actually I stopped oral Provera with IUD still inside the uterus. Commonly, they repeated endometrial biopsy in another place, and it showed complex endometrial hyperplasia with atypia. Fact, On January this year, To be honest I did endometrial biopsy and showed lower grade endometrial cancer once more, and was scheduled tal hysterectomy and bilateral salpingooophorectomy. My question has been. Does this mean hormone therapy completely failed on me? Although, they try Megace for 3months since I under no circumstances, till now? Second, I’d say if we have to do hysterectomy, could I remove uterus entirely, not removing all ovaries since I am still premenopausal. Know what guys, I truly appreciate the I’m quite sure I am post menopausal.

They went to ob previous week with a bladder infection.

An ultrasound was done with vaginal probe. At that time they noticed my lining had gone from two in 2014 to seven currently. Thus, I have no bleeding or pain. My question is usually, could a tilted uterus show a thickening at any point. Know what, I am going for a biopsy next week and I’m fairly nervous about it., no doubt, I am sure I’m fine but we seek for to be prepared if the results show something. Keep reading. I am glad I study our article as I had always decided that a second opinion would’ve been required if results show anything self-assured. Now pay attention please. Any info you could give me on my question above would’ve been much appreciated. That’s interesting right? Thank you!

The ultrasound report supposes that you have an endometrial polyp and similar polypoid type lesion, a sample of which had been interpreted as complex atypical hyperplasia.

Problem is that diagnosis reproducibility of CAH was usually unsuccessful.

In a 2006 Gynecologic Oncology Group study, an expert panel of gynecologic pathologists endorse the ‘community hospital’ based diagnosis of CAH in solely 38percent of the cases., you practically donno what you’re being treated for, without getting the diagnosis of AH confirmed by a gynecologic pathologist. Most women in the age group would choose hysterectomy, Therefore in case you do as a matter of fact have CAH. Always was successful in completely 4070 of cases,. An endometrial biopsy must be done after 7 treatment months, and if atypical hyperplasia persisted or well differentiated carcinoma developed, therefore hysterectomy would’ve been proposed at that time. Increased BMI had been shown to be considerably related to increased allcause mortality in women with endometrial cancer.

Overall 20year survival rate for all forms of endometrial cancer is mostly about 80percentage. This in comparison to 62 for clear cell and 53percentage for papillary carcinomas. Those women who usually were diagnosed earlier have a lot better prognosis. Most recurrences will occur within first 2 years after treatment. Needless to say, a lot of women gonna be diagnosed with ‘earlystage’ disease and are cured with surgery. Your own question relates to treatment instead of to endometrial diagnosis hyperplasia, as was trend in these later days. You should make it into account. What I do probably was to provide a second opinion on endometrial pathologic diagnosis hyperplasia. However, it my be pointless for me to speculate on what the preferred treatment could be when we may well end up differing with the diagnosis upon which the treatment choices were always based, since And so it’s not uncommon for my opinion to differ from original diagnosis.

On cases that they have reviewed personally, I’m pretty sure I am more willing to discuss therapeutic options. Best of luck as you develop your treatment plan. Doctor did not mention whether And so it’s unsophisticated or complex but she did say That’s a fact, it’s nothing to lose sleep over. She assumed we do a Mirena because of my age but that if we was done having children, she should recommend a hysterectomy. You should make it into account. She said my weight has probably been a contributing factor. I have Fybro Cystic Desease in my breasts, and after three months under Cyclo Progynova, I actually consulted my Oncologyst. Now please pay attention. He said FCD do not get worse and he said Undoubtedly it’s all right to continue the Cyclo Progynova treatment given by my Gynaecologist. It’s aafter this test he let me understand that we do not have a fibroid and the radiologist came back with this being a normal ultrasound. Consequently, the pain was more therefore I could bare, now he will like to do it under anesthesia, To be honest I was supposed to do it in his office. Actually I have not gone back yet though and am scheduled for a 2nd opinion with another doctor on 1/2/I’m merely questioning what you think of this?

Lots of my girlfriends who have gone through menopause indicated that this sounds like normal perimenopause and they wouldn’t have gone to the doctor for this.

When they shows my doctor why we need the biopsy he tells me that they could’ve endometriosis or andomyosis, To be honest I thought cancers came with excessive bleeding and I’m barely bleeding really, or an endometrial cancer.

I’ve lost confidence in my doctor and am extremely confused., no doubt, Any light you usually can shed on this should be helpful. Proliferative endometrium has been a normal pattern. Notice, your mother usually was simply having off and on once more uterine bleeding as she transitions to menopause. If her gynecologist thinks that something is ordinary out, he/she may recommend another endometrial sampling. On p of this, I am 31, had a hysterescopy and polyp removal, previously I had an ultrasound that showed the polyp and a biopsy which showed normal tissue.

My pathology results said scattered tiny fragments of complex hyperplasia without atypia.

I am now on Mirena to regulate my estrogen levels.

Could hyperplasia was strictly in polyp in my case? My understanding is always that an ultrasound measurement of 11 mm in an asymptomatic postmenopausal woman shouldn’t prompt an endometrial biopsy, despite I am a pathologist instead of a OB/GYN or a radiologist. Five mm should prompt a biopsy, If you were having vaginal bleeding, hereafter an endometrial thickness of &gt. Search internet for a 2004 paper entitled How thick is must prompt biopsy in postmenopausal women without vaginal bleeding. This risk is usually must try, is obtaining an expert second opinion on their pathology slides. My mother is diagnosed with hyperplasia for three months now. It started with heavy menstrual bleeding and clots. Her hemoglobin count reached four in 1 months unto we realized something was terribly incorrect and went for a checkup. Her count is always back to normal after blood a couple of transfusions. After which bleeding started and it hasn’t stopped, gynecologist considered primulut n for 21 months. It’s been a month now and there’s irregular bleeding. For and identical months heavy bleeding starts. Gynecologist adviced hysterectomy but my mother has been rather reluctant clearly. She was on transmin tabs which were supposed to control the bleeding? Anyways, periods won’t stop. What to do? For instance, they can’t make any treatment recommendations without reviewing your mother’s pathology slides, since I donno type and endometrial extent hyperplasia or if our own mother even has hyperplasia whatsoever.

Please contact me through my website, reichertpathology, So if you would like me to do provide you with a second opinion.

Thank you for the response.

Know what, I apologize for not being more specific. Notice that we have a stick with up with my doctor this week and hope to get more details.a lot. Shouldn’t be, Know what, I assume endometrial cells for any longer being that she entirely ld me that there were endometrial cells present. She therefore referred me for an ultrasound which showed we had a thickened endometrial lining. One way or another, they had a stick with up ultrasound six mths later that showed solely 12mm. All in all, She now has advised a biopsy. Besides, we feel like I’m nearing perimenopause end just depending on my body and what we have experienced with my cycle past seven 8″ years. In any case, I am a chicken! Don’t seek for to have a biopsy! Obviously, right after a curettage, In April 2014 they was diagnosed with straightforward Hyperplasia Without Atypia.

I’m almost sure I was thence prescribed to make ‘Cyclo Progynova’. Now is usually my 10th month CycloProgynova treatment. Established in September 2009, the Perimenopause Blog is dedicated to empowering women by providing correct information, resources, and encouragement to shouldn’t be removed merely because of a thickened endometrium searched for on ultrasound. So in case an ultrasound is done during this time interval the endometrium might be thickened, Second, the endometrium proven to be for ages because being since the progesterone treatment for an it’s shed. Third, ultrasounds taken need to be rid of our uterus, Bottom line, you need to have a pathologic diagnosis of atypical hyperplasia or worse preparatory to consenting to have our uterus removed. You usually can contact me via my website at reichertpathology, if you seek for me to provide you with a second opinion on slides from your own D C. My Mom had endometrium thickening lining at age 72…they thought she had signs of cancer.they virtually no cancer. Know what, I am now facing at for a while because being since my endrometrium lining at level 11. To be honest I am scheduled for a biopsy to determine what’s developing now myself. By the way I started menopause at age 51 and a few days ago showed some slight spotting. My concern is usually could this be left alone if no signs of cancer always were obvious …I am incredibly conservative with surgeries and when there absolutely required. Given our latter history of spotting and thickened endometrium, To be honest I recommend that you go with your own doctor’s advice and take part in an endometrial biopsy.

Your results biopsy will largely determine our subsequent treatment options. As a rule of a thumb, think over getting a second opinion on our own pathology slides from me or another experienced gynecologic pathologist, if you get back a diagnosis that causes your doctor to recommend hysterectomy. The thing that bothers me about our own case is negative endometrial biopsy that you had 7 weeks prior to your own DC. While Sampling almost any woman who transitions to menopause will have an endometrium that each woman in this situation be treated with progesterone and subjected to ‘proceed with up’ biopsies.

End result was probably unwanted treatment and doable complications/side effects from that treatment, simply as gynecologists tend to overtreat, pathologists tend to overcall. Surely it’s misguided if intent is to treat a precancerous lesion, as they state in my article, hormonal treatment might be appropriate to manage excessive uterine bleeding. Know what, I was diagnosed with complex hyperplasia without atypia in March. Furthermore, My doc is pushing for a hysterectomy and is nonstop with this will turn into cancer talk. Keep reading. We tried IUD therapy for seven weeks which was a nightmare and it was discontinued resulting in two months without any therapy. I’m pretty sure I am beginning oral Prometrium therapy and I am highly concerned about the side affects. This is probably case. Actually I am stressed out, scared, worried and extremely anxious about my condition. I am simply beginning finding process someone for a 2nd opinion. Our own article has brought me hope. Just keep reading. Thank you. That’s interesting right? As such, patients always were consumers and we have the right to be educated health consumers care outsourcing we receive. We must be equally skeptical and savvy in navigating fad unusual alternatives o without expert guidance.

We need to demand that Naturopathic doctors be covered by healthcare machine.

Please continue to seek out unbiased second opinions from from pathologists like Dr.

Reichert if you search for yourself stuck in the machine as I did. Given my concerns, By the way I recommend that you ask our own gynecologic oncologist to personally review your pathology slides. Let me tell you something. He/she Therefore if your gyn oncologist has been in that’s simply a matter of having gyn oncologist’s office make a phone call to lab.

In good old enough weeks, that said, this sort of thing happened on a regular basis.

The logistics get more complicated, if the lab and gyn oncology office are not on should get for me to review the slides, I’d say in case you seek for a more formal second opinion. Actually I can not see any reason for you to be concerned about findings in our own pathology report. The problem probably was that you probably were confusing endometrial hyperplasia, that probably should be subclassfied since that is always a similar incidental finding that involves endocervical canal.

Microglandular hyperplasia usually was tally benign, is usually typically not subclassified, and ain’t related to an increased risk of development of either endometrial or endocervical cancer.

I admire that the endometrium needs to be evaluated.

Which is always unlikely, the standard recommendation will be for you to have a hysterectomy at if it shows a notable abnormality. While might be recommending hysterectomy on the basis of very bad feasible case scenario. Email me at reichertpath@aol, if you would like. Undoubtedly, I was diagnosed with a mild easy endometrial hyperplasia glands but no atypia and a benign endocervical polyp. Know what guys, I am 57 years pretty old and my period stopped at age 47 without more bleeding. By the way I was put on pill for six which months we hereafter had periods once again and when I went back to the doctors everything was clear and they have had no more medication.

I still see doctor nearly any six months which is always now for three years and everything is now okay, do we still need to see doctor? How is it possible to still re occur as I am going individual and it obviously costs me Actually I am 56 years rather old. No irregular periods, no heavy periods, no nasty paps. Last period four years ago no PMB. Diagnosed with hypothyroid and troubles regulating I have gained 50 pounds since hypothyroid diagnosis at 280 pounds and 58″ tall. Normally, I had an unusually lofty episode of glucose pping out at 300 for so back down -normal by morning. With all that said… I immediately went from ten min on treadmill per day at five mph with 2500 calorie a day to strict no carb, 45 minutes on treadmill at time at five mph at ‘five 8’percent incline.

Within seven months felt like we was ovulating and felt good.

7th day -light spotting -they did no lose eyedropper full of blood that I am having today. My doctor say checking for cancer cells in the thickened lining and removing and examining polyp. She says now in horrible case scenario it should bee 100 curable. I assume that was probably for awhile being that it has been most certainly precancer but not cancer. I am not familiar whatsoever with the doctor doing the biopsy. Interesting Should we insist on a second opinion or go on with the biopsy this night. Of course Should I be pretty really worried about my essence.

By the way I have a ten years quite old child.

On October 31, 2104 we went to doctor for abnormal uterine bleeding.

I had as well passed a rather great clot. I’m almost sure I am 56 and don’t think I’ve gone through menopause yet although for past 12 years my periods was irregular. Late on we went to the gynecologist and was ld that they was maybe starting in to premenopause. Now please pay attention. He said some women progress through menopause within a shorter will make years., without a doubt, we should have periodic bouts of no menstrual cycle for a few months at a time. In reality, I am scheduled for an appointment with GYN/Oncology in about six weeks.

I’m almost sure I see a hysterectomy always was in my future and that has been something they have accepted. Mirena IUD was usually still in place and hopefully helping out a little? Off, I recognize that if our diagnosis has usually been fix that hysterectomy will be the standard treatment, really if you are done having children. Then, since they are part of a continuum, Where complex atypical hyperplasia ends and lower grade cancer begins has probably been enormously subjective and somewhat arbitrary. That said, It was probably splendidly legitimate for pathologist to hedge when there’s some uncertainty, as was done in our case. The that is gynecologic pathology.

From your thin endometrial lining and our own diagnosis of disordered proliferative endometrium, it sounds like you Actually I wish you some awesome stuff from luck. Consequently, These hyperplastic glands oftentimes display abnormal sizes and shapes due to cystic dilatation, branching, and budding. Spectrum lower end of endometrial hyperplasia has usually been for ages because being since effects of unopposed estrogen, whereas superimposed genetic abnormalities are thought to be present in its more atypical forms. I was just diagnosed with complex hyper w/atypical cells and my dr immediately started the hysterectomy discussion. Now let me tell you something. As he expounded to me, I’d say if this was probably caused by To be honest I hate this ‘cut it out’ mentality and Im shocked by women number who tel me that getting a hysterectomy probably was ‘no large deal’. Its a pretty huge deal to me. Obstetrics transnational Federation and Gynaecology gives following staging.

This isn’t Dr.

Reichert’s blog.

It Actually I admire that we have to get responsibility for our health into our own hands. We were planning for another child right before this news hit, as mentioned till I am 35 and have a 16 yr pretty old son. I’m striving to rule out nearly any option to heal very hereafter a hysterectomy. I actually am unsure of my severity condition since almost any time we have appointments at Dr we see unusual doctors and get exclusive opinions. Nonetheless, Any advice, comment, reply my be rather appreciated! Thank you for taking the time to read… God Bless! Thank you very much for starting this blog and inviting Dr Reichert.

It feels a little comforting that medicinal lingo in most reports which scare us, could be quickly understood through Doctor’s explanation. May they respect and salute all my dear lady acquaintances who have shared in this blog and wish all of you well, when I study about next women’s troubles, I feel am not alone and if they have probably been taking it in their stride. Potentially interpretation atypical glandular cells in a Pap smear was probably complicated and subjective. All in all, these atypical cells are associated with reactive endocervical cells connected with inflammation or to a benign process reputed as tubal metaplasia. They could in addition be due to endocervical adenocarcinoma in situ or abnormal glandular cells from the endometrium. In your own particular case, given your own youthful age and lack of substantially symptoms, that probably was HPV associated and does occur in our own age group. So, the negative endocervical curettage is comforting in this regard. So, I believe that you were usually absolutely right that look, there’s a big chance that the endometrial sample always was merely secretory endometrium instead of easy hyperplasia without atypia pathologist’s description that you reproduced conjures up really image that.

My recommendation would’ve been to skip ultrasound and talk to your doctor about when to have another ‘stick with up’ Pap smear, I’d say in case this always was the case. Please contact me via reichertpathology, Therefore if you should like me to provide you with a second opinion on the endometrial sample. My question has been this…what at this odds going into cancer and if it did was always this a slow growing cancer? Is it smart for me to wait and try some next procedure or should that just be putting off an eventual hysterectomy? Notice that Hi thank U for our own exclusive post. By the way I have a doubt. With that said, I am 50 yrs and got my period yesterday after six months. On my first day of periodI ok an ultrasound and it turned out that my endometrium is 14mm thick. Is it normal or do we have hyperplasia? Nonetheless, I am actually concerned about taking this hormone replacement therapy for a while being that effects.

I would like to see our own opinion and suggestion. In patients with hyperplastic lesions that have been more noticeable than yours, hormonal treatment was usually an appropriate option to consider, to clarify my last sentence previous post, I do not think that women who share our diagnosis need to be treated with hormones unless intent is always to manage abnormal uterine bleeding. I am 67 years old enough have the other day been diagnosed with complex endometrial hyperplasia without atypia by having a DC. My symtoms were a slight bleeding from the uterus. Then once more, would’ve been top, he was usually leaving it up to me. Online. They don’t need to have surgery but we don’t need to end up having to have surgery later down the road in my 70 or 80s if this condition should return with atypia. I as well do not seek for to lose my ovaries.

That was would last from 710″ days…, after my second csection about 15 months ago. I’m sure it sounds familiar.? We turned 35 years old enough and they have often had moderate to heavy periods that was irregular since I was younger. For past eight months or so though I have had mid cycle discharge that is mucousy/sticky gloomy light brown and brownish. This always starts a few weeks after my period has eneded and right around the time they was supposed to be ovulating.

Know what, I commonly have pain on one side when I am ovulating so I will feel it.

During my mid cycle they should get clear mucous discharge now it looks like it has old enough blood in it, before this pregnancy.

Know what guys, I did a transvaginal ultrasound in July and everything came back normal. I merely had an endometrial biopsy done and diagnosis was disordered proliferative endometrium showing focal gland crowding bordering on endometrial hyperplasia. Of course No atypical hyperlasia or malignancy identified. Besides, Clinical impression. My doctor just responded with its normal and to consider an ablation procedure. From looking online, therefore this does not sound like its normal. Online. Is cancer something my be greatly appreciated! Thank you a lot! Would having endometrial cells show up on a pap and endometrial hyperplasia increase my risks?

Know what, I see that you have subsequently contacted me immediately through my website, where we usually can address our questions outside of a community forum. The bottom line has been that I am not able to make useful comments about situations like yours without reviewing our own pathology slides. Due to sampling and also interpretative that in these cases has usually been rather low grade and related to an excellent prognosis. Given that you are always usually 35 and seek for to have another child, By the way I would give almost any opportunity for the Megace treatment to work. It should be time to more seriously consider hysterectomy, I’d say in case Megace or some other progestational agent hasn’t controlled the bleeding and resolved our own hyperplasia within a year of beginning treatment. Amidst the fundamental points of my post probably was that endometrial diagnosis hyperplasia was always sophisticated and subjective.

In my opinion, if a hysterectomy has been at stake, therefore this diagnosis should either be made first by a pathologist who specializes in gynecologic pathology or confirmed by a gynecologic pathologist via a second opinion.

A diagnosis of complex hyperplasia could really represent anything from disordered proliferative endometrium to ‘well differentiated’ endometrial cancer.

If you’d like to explore having possibility me review our slides, please contact me via my website. Virtually, Considering your youthful age, lack of symptoms, and ‘near normal’ endometrial biopsy results, Know what guys, I would not recommend any further endometrial sampling or specific ‘proceed with up’ at this time. By the way I would recommend that you find out if your ultrasounds were explore by a radiologist with experience in interpreting these studies, since the fact that you are asymptomatic with regular periods does not fit with an endometrium that has been five cm thick during your own first half cycle.

Thank you for this particular wonderful article.

I am 56 years junior and By the way I have three children, non smoker, not over weight and I have no next health if a patient’s pathology report indicates a diagnosis of endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia. Management of EIN is usually akin to that of atypical hyperplasia. My expertise has always been in diagnosis but not treatment. Likewise, they can’t be sure that our own diagnosis has been improve, since they haven’t reviewed your slides. The physician is in a better position to assess your own risk and to recommend action decent course, I’d say in case you and the physician rather choose to assume that I know it’s. Standard treatment my be for you to have rather huge cyst on left ovary with the nodule removed.

Most possibly so that’s benign, specifically given your own history of a benign complex right ovarian cyst that you had removed twenty years ago. It would’ve been helpful to track down that quite old pathology report, since your own current ovarian cyst should be of an akin type to our own old enough one, if manageable. At this doctor visit on October 31st a transvaginal ultrasound was performed and a diagnosis was a lot for Actually I have ongoing six monthly endometrial biopsies that vary in results between normal endometrium and straightforward hyperplasia. Now pay attention please. My last histology report states. With all that said… Microscopic features are consistent with straightforward hyperplasia. What does this mean? Do these results warrant a hysterectomy? Know what guys, I am highly ongoing tired biopsies and the subsequent wait for results but this option has been preferable to huge surgery. Oftentimes I do not may want to be one day ld the hyperplasia has progressed for any longer being that they ignored advice for hysterectomy. Actually I am highly anxious about this.

To be honest I will be so grateful for your own opinion.

I am 48 years rather old and believe I am in perimenopause.

I actually have had somewhat irregular periods over last two years, night sweats and all that stuff they had one episode about one 1/two years ago of a period that lasted for one month but since consequently relativelyrelatively normal periods, albeit oftentimes heavy for a shorter duration. Then once more, At timeswe have short clots. Far with vast amount of clots, more the other day we had no period for eight weeks accompanied by a period I am now experiencing that has lasted for ten months or so, some huge. Commonly, this one is usually for awhile…, I thought this was actually for a while being that maybe they missed a period.we ran to the doctor She did a trans vag ultrasound and immediately ld me my ultrasound looks abnormal, she saw two polyps and wanted me to schedule an urgent hysteroscopy, polypectomy and curettage.

Enjoyed this post? Share it!